Smallholder Accounts

Three Farmers, One Dry Spell: Talking Through Consent First

By Emeka Chukwudi · 3 Aug 2026 · 5 min read

Smallholder farmer speaking with a field researcher

Before any of the three interviews behind this piece began, we explained the same thing each time: what we were recording, where it might appear, and that saying no at any point, even mid-conversation, was fine and would change nothing about how we treated the rest of the visit. Two farmers agreed to be named. One preferred to speak without her name attached, and that request is honoured here.

The dry spell in question ran roughly six weeks longer than the growers we spoke with had planned for, and each of the three had handled it differently, shaped as much by what they could afford to risk as by what the weather demanded.

Different farms, different margins for error

The first farmer we spoke with, working roughly four hectares outside Lafia, had irrigation access and treated the dry spell as a manageable delay rather than a crisis. The second, farming a smaller plot with no irrigation, made the decision early to sacrifice part of the planting to concentrate water on the rest, a choice she described plainly rather than dramatically.

"You don't panic. You look at what you have water for, and you decide what you're willing to lose before the ground decides for you."

The third grower, working communal land with several other households, described a more collective response: pooling the little irrigation equipment available and rotating its use by need rather than by plot size, an arrangement he credited with keeping every household's core crop alive, if not thriving.

Why the framing matters as much as the facts

It would be easy to write this as a story about hardship, and there was real hardship in it. But each of the three farmers pushed back, gently but clearly, against language that made them sound like passive victims of the weather. What they described instead were active, reasoned decisions made under real constraint, and that distinction shaped how we chose to write this piece.

None of the three accounts are presented as representative of the dry spell's impact more broadly. They're three specific decisions, made by three specific people, recorded with their agreement, and left as close to their own words as we could manage.

Interested in how we approach interviews and consent?

We're glad to talk through our process, or discuss the reporting course that covers it in depth.

Get in Touch